Cyxtera Total Fraud Protection vs Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cyxtera Total Fraud Protection and Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
60
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Easy Solutions
Learn More
Overview

Total Fraud Protection a Flexible and comprehensive multi-layered fraud protection across all devices, channels and clouds. Using industry-leading data analytics to detect attacks in real time before they can cause any damage, each layer of Total Fraud Protection can be deployed independently, but becomes even more powerful when implemented as a suite that shares fraud intelligence to make each layer more effective.

Oracle Adaptive Access Manager helps organizations prevent fraud and misuse by strengthening existing authentication flows, evaluating the risk of events as they happen and providing risk-based interdiction mechanisms such as multi-factor out-of-band authentication. Intuitive policy administration and standardized integrations with the Identity and Access Management Suite components makes Oracle Adaptive Access Manager uniquely flexible and effective at reducing an enterprise's security exposure. Oracle Adaptive Access Manager provides real-time and batch risk analytics to combat fraud and misuse across multiple channels of access. It automates reviews of access and transaction events to detect fraud and misuse resulting in saved time and money, a proven capabilities and quick return on investment.
Sample Customers
Grupo Bancolombia, Banco del Pacifico, Caja Municipal Ica, Banco de Reservas, Banco Estado, Banco Ganadero Bolivia, Dunbar Digital Armor, City National Bank
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Sudhir Power Ltd., Joyo Bank Ltd., Boxfusion, Mitsubishi Corporation, Saga d.o.o. Beograd, Asia Commercial Bank, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Yapi Kredi Bank, Overhead Door Corporation, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cyxtera Total Fraud Protection is ranked 48th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Cyxtera Total Fraud Protection is rated 0.0, while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cyxtera Total Fraud Protection is most compared with , whereas Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.