Eclipse Luna vs TeamCity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Eclipse Foundation Logo
272 views|207 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
JetBrains Logo
3,373 views|2,977 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eclipse Luna and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Amazon Web Services (AWS), JetBrains and others in IDE.
To learn more, read our detailed IDE Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very extensible and uses resources optimally.""Eclipse's auto-code suggestion feature makes programming very easy and fast.""It works like a one-stop shop for all of our application development requirements."

More Eclipse Luna Pros →

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications.""Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes.""The integration is a valuable feature.""I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.""One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.""Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products.""Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end.""We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."

More TeamCity Pros →

Cons
"Eclipse can sometimes be a plugin nightmare. Various plugins require different versions of the same plugin running for different reasons.""The development of the product needs improvement.""I would like to see it extend native support for functional languages like Scala."

More Eclipse Luna Cons →

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs.""We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US.""If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users.""REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings.""Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.""The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain.""It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there.""I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

More TeamCity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
  • "The licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More TeamCity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IDE solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Eclipse's auto-code suggestion feature makes programming very easy and fast.
    Top Answer:It is available free of cost on the Eclipse website. Anyone can download from there as per their needs. There are different versions available for different languages.
    Top Answer:The only improvement I need in Eclipse is it consumes a lot of RAM, which makes my PC slow. If the Eclipse team can solve this issue, it would be very impactful for us (Developers). Also, opening a… more »
    Top Answer:TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool.
    Top Answer:It's open source, however, if you want your solution to be deployed on their cloud or on the cloud in general without you being involved and having it and managed by them, there may be costs involved… more »
    Top Answer:It's just a tool that I used. I needed to deliver something, so I did. I wasn't looking at it in a way to criticize it or to optimize it. As a user, I need some more graphical design. For example, in… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 25 in IDE
    Views
    272
    Comparisons
    207
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    623
    Rating
    9.0
    6th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,373
    Comparisons
    2,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    574
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 44% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Eclipse Luna includes official support for Java 8 in the Java development tools, Plug-in Development Tools, Object Teams, Eclipse Communication Framework, Maven integration, Xtext, Xtend, Web Tools Platform, and Memory Analyzer. The Eclipse workbench provides a new dark theme, split editors, line numbers on by default, reduced whitespace in default presentation, ability to hide the "quick access" bar and fitting syntax highlighter setting for the editor of several programming languages. Paho provides open source implementations of open and standard messaging protocols that support current and emerging requirements of M2M integration with Web and Enterprise middleware and applications. EcoreTools, the graphical modeler for Ecore, has been completely re-implemented based on Sirius and provides a nicer graphical design, support for documenting your model, specifying domain constraints and modeling Generic Types. It provides a standalone C/C++ debugger application that is added to the CDT to help debug an application via the command line and have an Eclipse UI debugger pop up.

    TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

    Sample Customers
    NASA
    Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Leisure / Travel Company7%
    Non Tech Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    IDE
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Amazon Web Services (AWS), JetBrains and others in IDE. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Eclipse Luna is ranked 5th in IDE with 3 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Eclipse Luna is rated 8.6, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eclipse Luna writes "Good plugins and helpful templates with a useful auto-code suggestion feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Eclipse Luna is most compared with Oracle SQL Developer, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Tekton.

    We monitor all IDE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.