We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Many innovative "microservice" Enterprise Java environments and frameworks already exist in the Java ecosystem. These projects are creating new features and capabilities to address microservice architectures -- leveraging both Java EE and non-Java EE technologies.
The goal of the Eclipse MicroProfile project is to iterate and innovate in short cycles to propose new common APIs and functionality, get community approval, release, and repeat. Eventually, the outputs of this project could be submitted to the Eclipse Jakarta EE, JCP, OpenJDK or any relevant standards body.
For many years, Java EE has been a major platform for mission-critical enterprise applications. In order to accelerate business application development for a cloud-native world, leading software vendors collaborated to move Java EE technologies to the Eclipse Foundation where they will evolve under the Jakarta EE brand.
Eclipse MicroProfile is ranked 6th in Java Frameworks while Jakarta EE is ranked 3rd in Java Frameworks with 1 review. Eclipse MicroProfile is rated 0.0, while Jakarta EE is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A greatly improved product with versatility in software development options". Eclipse MicroProfile is most compared with Spring Boot, Vert.x, Open Liberty, Amazon Corretto and Spring MVC, whereas Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring Boot, Spring MVC, Vert.x, Amazon Corretto and Apache Spark.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.