We performed a comparison between Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."I would say that the cross-integration between different modules, such as between the OCR, RPA, and ML, is the most valuable feature."
"The ease of building automations is a 10 out of 10. It automates our tasks faster and gives us positive and accurate results."
"The best feature of UiPath is the integration. UiPath works very well for the automation of our facilities and systems. It not only integrates with our production systems but also with our ERP and CRM. It integrates with all of our processes so that we work in a unified manner and efficient manner."
"The most valuable features are some of the panels in UiPath Studio. For example, there is a debugging panel and a Designer panel. The debugging panel is useful because without it we could not solve any problems. The debugging panel provides functionality such as Step Into and Step Out, and we have highlight buttons. It helps us to analyze our code, what is wrong in a solution, and debug from the start to the end, to make the solution better. The Designer panel is where we create a workflow or step-by-step process, the place where a developer develops the code."
"There are two features that I like a lot in UiPath: one is the Orchestrator option, and the other one is the Studio option."
"In addition to savings in time and cost, UiPath further saves us money because of the reduction in human error."
"There are a lot of powerful box components with the possibilities of creating your own."
"I find the most valuable features are automation and RPA."
"UiPath has reduced human error by 20%."
"Better training and better accessibility of the tools are the things that need to be improved."
"The update process has resulted in several small issues for us. Sometimes when you update, there are several lines that are not included in the package. This kind of technical error, even though it's small, has to improve."
"Training materials should include behind-the-scenes information such as what goes on underneath the infrastructure and how components interact with each other."
"One area that could be improved is how we access the UiPath Academy courses."
"UiPath needs to improve Orchestrator and its back office licenses."
"I would like a better way to find the little things that aren't simply named."
"Creating a trigger that is based on either the arrival of a file or the arrival of an email is a common scenario and it should be built into the platform so that I don't have to code for it every time."
"Dynamic Selectors should have a specific chapter apart, as most of the tools are currently driven as such."
"UiPath's processing speed is a little slow. That's its only drawback compared to other tools."
Earn 20 points
Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is ranked 42nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 760 reviews. Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is rated 6.0, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA writes "Stable with good cross-integration between modules, but the training needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Robocorp and Pega Robotic Process Automation.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
