We performed a comparison between EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Good email automation and XL automation."
"The tool follows a role-based working model to create things. It helps to track what others are doing with the system."
"AssistEdge made it so that the reps didn't need to maneuver through 10 or 20 different systems. We tied all that together in the background, so the reps had a shared UI, and everything else happened in the background without their knowledge. When they were retrieving data, it was done in the background through automation and pulling up to that generic UI layer"
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"AssistEdge isn't a simple tool like Blue Prism or other RPA solutions with configurable items that you can drag and drop. This involved a lot of hard coding, which posed two challenges. One, we did not have that skillset, so we depended on Infosys. Two, it's a beast to go back and update or make changes when things are hard coded because you can't just move those configurable items back around."
"Lacks integration with third party tools."
"The tool's alternatives work on drag-and-drop functionality without creating custom code. We don't have an in-built queue system and use RabbitMQ for it. The solution also doesn't have a framework."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is rated 6.6, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA writes "The support team was great, but we had to rely on them too much because it lacks a drag-and-drop interface and everything is hard coded". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate and Pega Robotic Process Automation, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.