EduWave vs PowerSchool comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ITG Solutions Logo
24 views|18 comparisons
PowerSchool Logo
248 views|211 comparisons
Ranking
Views
24
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
248
Comparisons
211
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
EduWave K-12, EduWave Higher-Ed, EduWave HE
Learn More
ITG Solutions
Video Not Available
Overview

The Comprehensive E-Learning & Education Platform for K-12 Schools

The Comprehensive E-Learning & Education Platform for Universities and Colleges

Administrative, web-based communications tool, integrating all aspects of a student information system.
Sample Customers
The Royal Hashemite Court, Jordan Ministry of Education, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology, German Jordanian University, USAID, Kingdom of Bahrain Ministry of Education, Royal Health Awareness Society, Amman Chamber of Commerce, International Beverage Consultancy
Amilia, SchoolMint, Harris School Solutions, LunchTime Software, MARi, Buzz, ParentSquare
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization45%
Computer Software Company8%
Consumer Goods Company5%
Government4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise34%
Large Enterprise35%

EduWave is ranked 12th in K-12 Student Information Systems (SIS) while PowerSchool is ranked 1st in K-12 Student Information Systems (SIS). EduWave is rated 0.0, while PowerSchool is rated 0.0. On the other hand, EduWave is most compared with JoomLMS, whereas PowerSchool is most compared with Infinite Campus and Pearson Chancery SMS.

See our list of best K-12 Student Information Systems (SIS) vendors.

We monitor all K-12 Student Information Systems (SIS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.