Compare Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR.""DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options.""The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.""The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.""The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.""The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.""The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup.""The most valuable features are the desktop and mobile modules.""TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros »

Cons
"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing.""The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans.""If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Cons »

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.""The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.""The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.""The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.""The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools.""The licensing costs are a little bit high and should be reduced.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.""The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower.""It costs a few hundred per year, but I am not sure. It is not at all expensive as compared to other tools."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use… more »
Top Answer: The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab… more »
Top Answer: The primary reason that we got Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is that we have a couple of systems that are run through virtual machines. Everybody who uses it in our company needs to go… more »
Top Answer: The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy.
Top Answer: The price is moderate. It's not the cheapest or the most expensive if you compare it with other competitors. It's okay.
Top Answer: We have something called Name Mapping in TestComplete it is the only Name Mapping that is available for TestComplete. If they allowed two Name Mappings, or run Name Mapping in run time, that would be… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
8,991
Comparisons
4,804
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,653
Rating
9.0
4th
Views
14,767
Comparisons
10,402
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
491
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eggplant DAI
Learn More
Overview

A modern AI-assisted approach to test automation that helps you create products that delight users, deliver at DevOps speed, test the full customer experience, test ANY technology, and predict the quantified impact of new product versions on the user before release.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
Non Tech Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm8%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company32%
Manufacturing Company9%
Construction Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is rated 9.4, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence writes "Enables end-to-end testing, including smoke tests and several others". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Speed, configuration consistency, and accuracy of tests with fantastic results". Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One, froglogic Squish and Worksoft Certify, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One, Ranorex Studio and TestProject. See our Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.