Compare Eggplant Functional vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Eggplant Functional? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Functional vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it.""The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them.""The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

More Eggplant Functional Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.""The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.""The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.""The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.""The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.""Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.""The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros »

Cons
"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution.""The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement.""In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

More Eggplant Functional Cons »

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.""The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.""The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.""The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.""The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.""Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR.
Top Answer: When you have release branches and you make feature branches then you can commit. But you cannot make a push, that can only be done on the master and it's not very compatible. It can also be difficult… more »
Top Answer: I'm a Test Tool Expert and we're customers of Eggplant Functional and have a good relationship with them. We were the first company in Switzerland to use them. We automate regression tests and there… more »
Top Answer: Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.
Top Answer: I'm not sure if there are licensing costs involved in the solution. We simply bought the product outright and started using it.
Top Answer: The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS. Right now, Complete can test only on native… more »
Ranking
18th
Views
9,146
Comparisons
4,289
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
409
Avg. Rating
7.3
4th
Views
19,140
Comparisons
12,770
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Also Known As
TestPlant eggPlant Functional
Learn
Keysight Technologies
SmartBear
Overview
eggPlant Functional helps you test your applications better, faster, and with less effort by automating the execution of your functional testing. eggPlant Functional has revolutionized functional test automation with its patented image-based approach to GUI testing. eggPlant can interact with any device (including mobile, tablet, desktop, server, and the Internet of Things) in the same way a user does, by looking at the screen. eggPlant uses sophisticated image and text search algorithms to locate objects on the screen in a completely technology agnostic manner and then drive the device. eggPlant’s user-centric test automation approach also makes it incredibly intuitive to write tests, so anyone can be productive with eggPlant within a few hours.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Functional
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Meredith Corporation, QNX CARŽ Platform for InfotainmentCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
Retailer6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Manufacturing Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider10%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Media Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Functional vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Eggplant Functional is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Eggplant Functional is rated 7.4, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Eggplant Functional writes "Enables you to insert all the various elements into the repository and then run your tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". Eggplant Functional is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One, froglogic Squish and Worksoft Certify, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and froglogic Squish. See our Eggplant Functional vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.