Compare Eggplant Performance vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We find the solution stable and scalable.""We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

More Eggplant Performance Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I""The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads.""The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

Cons
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

More Eggplant Performance Cons »

"Improvements to the reporting would be good.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check.""We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD.""Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

More Eggplant Performance Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use.""We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a… more »
Top Answer: Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to… more »
Top Answer: One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get. They could be simplified and easier to read. The language in the reports, on occasion, can be too technical and is not… more »
Top Answer: The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and… more »
Top Answer: We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000. I don't think there are any additional costs to standard licensing.
Top Answer: Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.
Ranking
Views
1,415
Comparisons
1,142
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,453
Rating
8.5
Views
5,695
Comparisons
3,805
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
805
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
TestPlant eggPlant Performance
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
Learn More
Overview
eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is a simple, smart and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing solution for agile and DevOps teams. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Sample Customers
Cisco
Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization50%
Financial Services Firm20%
Retailer20%
Engineering Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Eggplant Performance is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 8.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "We gave them our requirements and they built all the monitoring and alerts that we need, for both our website and product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Enabled us to eliminate load generators, and automatically triggers and produces reports". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Cavisson NetStorm. See our Eggplant Performance vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.