We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"The product is good, and the concept is good as well."
"The solution offers helpful guidelines and has good documentation."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is easy to use and has flexibility that allows it to be used on a variety of applications."
"Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."
"It is mostly user-friendly and usable."
"IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center."
"With LoadRunner Enterprise, doing various types of performance testing, load testing, and automation testing has been very helpful for some of the teams."
"Support is nice, quick, and responsive."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"The product's scalability must be improved."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
