Compare Eggplant Performance vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We find the solution stable and scalable."

More Eggplant Performance Pros »

"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

More Eggplant Performance Cons »

"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We find the solution stable and scalable.
Top Answer: In terms of pricing, we're happy with the pricing model. It has the ability to use a combination of on-premise or term licensing. We have the ability to say, "Well, I need for this performance test to… more »
Top Answer: On Eggplant's Performance side, it does what we wish and everything we need it to do at this stage. It's integrating very well into the pipeline. Overall, it's helped us. I don't recall any features… more »
Top Answer: Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.
Top Answer: We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months.
Top Answer: Our issues with the solution were related to the license and the support. We had a technical issue related to our software and they weren't able to solve the problem.
Ranking
Views
1,418
Comparisons
1,137
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
928
Rating
9.0
Views
6,883
Comparisons
3,807
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
314
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
TestPlant eggPlant Performance
NeoLoad
Learn More
Overview
eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Cisco
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Comms Service Provider6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Individual & Family Service13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Eggplant Performance is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 9.0, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Integrates well other solutions, offers good reporting, and is scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Appium, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus UFT One and BlazeMeter, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.