Anonymous UserDirector and Principal Consultant at a consultancy
Ganganjaneya ThummalaDelivery Manager at cigniti
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."
"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications."
"While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools."
"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.
Eggplant Performance is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 9.0, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Integrates well other solutions, offers good reporting, and is scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Appium, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus UFT One and BlazeMeter, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.