Compare Eggplant Performance vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Eggplant Performance? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.""The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.
Top Answer: I'm not sure if there are licensing costs involved in the solution. We simply bought the product outright and started using it.
Top Answer: The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS. Right now, Complete can test only on native… more »
Ranking
13th
Views
1,444
Comparisons
1,143
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
5th
Views
19,022
Comparisons
12,689
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
426
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
TestPlant eggPlant Performance
Learn
Keysight Technologies
SmartBear
Overview
eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
CiscoCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm12%
Healthcare Company5%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Manufacturing Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise37%
Large Enterprise47%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Eggplant Performance is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 5th in Test Automation Tools with 9 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 0.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Appium, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Ranorex Studio, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and Eggplant Functional.

See our list of .

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.