Ekahau Site Survey vs RedSeal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ekahau Logo
5,341 views|3,023 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
RedSeal Logo
31 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekahau Site Survey and RedSeal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Modeling and Simulation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Ekahau lets you create heat maps without doing the initial survey. It makes the task easier.""I like Ekahau's interface and the reports it can generate.""The most valuable feature of Ekahau Site Survey is the predictive survey.""Channel planning, access points' auto position, and the size of the spectrum are valuable to me.""Ekahau Site Survey is scalable.""The planning feature is useful because it's very affordable.""The solution is user-friendly and it provides a good output that can be measured, and I can describe and pinpoint any inaccuracy shortfalls.""Ekahau Site Survey is user-friendly."

More Ekahau Site Survey Pros →

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out.""This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score.""The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

More RedSeal Pros →

Cons
"I find the power button hard to access with just one hand.""Ekahau Site Survey is an expensive solution, and its pricing should be improved.""The new Sidekick is going to support Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E.""I would say that the indoor site accuracy is pretty good but the outdoor one should be improved. I would say if there was a way to put trees in there and canopies, that would be great.""The information regarding the clients and signal strengths is missing in the Ekahau console.""Most features are there, but the network adapter support should be better. Ekahau should support all laptops and versions. There's an issue with the driver too.""It would be better if it provided clear visibility. It would be better if it accommodated large physical sites like a warehouse with a ceiling height of more than twelve to fifteen feet. In such situations, we were unable to provide better coverage.""The support is an area in need of improvement."

More Ekahau Site Survey Cons →

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency.""Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

More RedSeal Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution is not cheap. If you only need an occasional site survey, you are better off contracting a wireless engineering professional that has one."
  • "The solution is priced fairly for the features that you receive."
  • "The licenses are a little pricey compared to iBwave, etc."
  • "The pricing could be lower because the Huawei radial planning is free for the partner. When I asked my boss about buying Ekahau and the USB key, it was complicated because of the high cost, which is €5,000."
  • "That's a tricky thing. When it started off, we had one three-year license and one one-year license because we have two devices. Now, from my understanding, we can only renew every year or get a one-year license, and that cost varies. Being a government organization, we get a different cost than commercial. We have deployed it on Surface Pro tablets. So, the only other cost would be the hardware cost."
  • "The pricing is quite expensive. Not all companies can afford it"
  • "We pay $6,000 yearly for the licensing, but each piece of hardware, the Ekahau Sidekick, is $5,000."
  • "I believe that it is approximately $2,000 per year for us. I know we pay for it on an annual basis."
  • More Ekahau Site Survey Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."
  • More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We reviewed the maps as a team and determined if any changes needed to be made or if we could just replace APs as they are. We got into this by upgrading our access points to Meraki, and we wanted to… more »
    Top Answer:We were able to recover some access points in some areas that were over-saturated. There were at least two areas where we had twice as many access points as we needed. We redesigned it and pulled some… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    5,341
    Comparisons
    3,023
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    31
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Over 12 years in the making, ESSTM maintains its reputation as the easiest to use, enterprise-grade Wi-Fi design and maintenance tool for Wi-Fi professionals. With crystal clear heat maps and easy-to-use reports, ESS makes it simple to optimize Wi-Fi.

    ESS allows you to plan and create Wi-Fi networks according to your performance and capacity requirements—taking into consideration the increasing amount of wireless clients and applications such as VoIP, HD video streaming and web browsing.

    RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

    Sample Customers
    Presidio, Planet Earth, Ruckus
    United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Educational Organization10%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Modeling and Simulation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ekahau Site Survey is ranked 1st in Network Modeling and Simulation with 30 reviews while RedSeal is ranked 20th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Ekahau Site Survey is rated 8.8, while RedSeal is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ekahau Site Survey writes "Valuable troubleshooting tools and easy to scale, but outdated documentation, issues with stability, and lacks differentiated survey modes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Provides a graphical overview of our network and is easy to deploy, but needs a user-friendly interface and a feature for compliance audit policy". Ekahau Site Survey is most compared with AirMagnet Survey, iBwave Wi-Fi and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas RedSeal is most compared with Skybox Security Suite, AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Darktrace and Tufin Orchestration Suite.

    We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.