We performed a comparison between Elastic Beats and Power Admin PA File Sight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."There's a whole spectrum of features on the solution that users can take advantage of. It's a very robust product."
"The security aspects in general have been very useful to use."
"The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"The dashboard is not user-friendly. The solution, in general, isn't great from a user's perspective."
"At some level, the documentation, the information as far as the components, it's sometimes a little difficult to find the information necessary to implement aspects."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
Earn 20 points
Elastic Beats doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Log Management while Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review. Elastic Beats is rated 8.0, while Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Beats writes "A robust solution with a whole spectrum of features that's extremely scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". Elastic Beats is most compared with , whereas Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
