We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The stability is very good."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."
"It can handle millions of loads at a time, and you can always use the filters to find exactly what you are looking for and detect errors in every log message you are searching for, basically."
"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."
"Elastic Security is a highly flexible platform that can be implemented anywhere."
"It's very customizable, which is quite helpful."
"The solution has a good community surrounding it for lots of helpful documentation for troubleshooting purposes."
"We've found the initial setup to be quite straightforward."
"I like the indexing of the logs."
"The solution has been quite stable."
"Overall, the product is quite flexible."
"The user interface is easy to maintain once it is setup."
"There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well."
"Using dashboards, it is very easy to manage."
"Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the daily updates and protection from virus attacks."
"The product is quite scalable."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Detections could be improved."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"We had issues with scalability. Logstash was not scaling and aggregation was getting delayed. We moved to Fluentd making our stack from ELK to EFK."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"The Integration module could be improved. It is a pain to build integration with any product. We have to do parking and so on. It's not like other commercial solutions that use profile integration. I would also see more detection features on the SIEM side."
"The solution could offer better reporting features."
"It's a little bit of a learning curve to understand the logic of searching for things and trying to find what you're looking for in Elastic Security."
"The price of this product could be improved, especially the additional costs. I would also like to see better-quality graphics."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"The training that is offered for Elastic is in need of improvement because there is no depth to it."
"If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution."
"The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky."
"This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced."
"I would like to see better-enhanced features, such as protection against ransomware and different types of malicious malware."
"It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection."
"We would like to know where attacks are coming from."
"We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security could have more visibility and threat hunting. Right now, if it detects a file, it's quarantined, and then we can't find more details other than the path and the file name. We don't see what process it's warning off and how the virus got in. So, the reporting on the quarantined items, why were they quarantined, etc., could be improved."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 15th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 58 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 108 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Micro Apex One. See our Elastic Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.