Compare ELK Logstash vs. LogDNA

ELK Logstash is ranked 7th in Log Management with 9 reviews while LogDNA is ranked 13th in Log Management with 1 review. ELK Logstash is rated 8.0, while LogDNA is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of ELK Logstash writes "Fast, easy and offers easy infrastructure monitoring abilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogDNA writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". ELK Logstash is most compared with Graylog, IBM QRadar, Splunk, vRealize Log Insight and Loggly, whereas LogDNA is most compared with IBM QRadar, Splunk, Google Stackdriver, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and Solarwinds Papertrail.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 3 Devo reviews.
4,532 views|2,658 comparisons
ELK Logstash Logo
21,900 views|19,403 comparisons
LogDNA Logo
575 views|506 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.

More Devo Pros »

The solution has a good community surrounding it for lots of helpful documentation for troubleshooting purposes.The most valuable feature for me is Discover.I use the stack every morning to check the errors and it's just so clear. I don't see any disadvantage to using Logstash.It's simple and easy to use.ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses.The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers.The feature that helps us to create a report for the login testing of Logstash is the most valuable aspect of the solution.The visualization is very good.

More ELK Logstash Pros »

The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface.

More LogDNA Pros »

Cons
The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.

More Devo Cons »

The solution needs to be more reactive to investigations. We need to be able to detect and prevent any attacks before it can damage our infrastructure. Currently, this solution doesn't offer that.I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified.One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty.This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it.In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts.Anything that supports high availability or ease of deployment in a highly available environment would help to improve this solution.The machine learning is not included in the free version. It is only included in the Platinum or Gold versions. It would be helpful if the machine learning features were available even on the free version of the solution. RSA and IBM are other solutions that also offer machine learning, which is interesting for us, but they cost money.There are connectors to gather logs for Windows PCs and Linux PCs, but if we have to get the logs from Syslog then we have to do it manually, and this should be automated.

More ELK Logstash Cons »

No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team.

More LogDNA Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

This is an open-source product, so there are no costs.Elastic Stack is an open-source tool. You don't have to pay anything for the components.We are using the free, open-source version of this solution.We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution.

More ELK Logstash Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 60% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustElastic Stack, ELK Stack
Learn
Devo
Elastic
LogDNA
Overview

Devo unlocks the full value of machine data for the world’s most instrumented enterprises by putting more data to work now. With Devo, IT executives finally realize the transformational promise of machine data to drive breakthrough projects that move the entire business forward.

Logstash is an open source, server-side data processing pipeline that ingests data from a multitude of sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to your favorite “stash.”

LogDNA is a powerful, multi-cloud log management system that aggregates all system, server, and application logs into one modernized platform. Centralize, monitor, store, tail, and analyze logs in real-time with one simple command-line or web interface. Setup takes just 1-2 minutes. Deploy as a cloud SaaS solution, on-premises using your own infrastructure, or as a hybrid solution. Empower your engineers with the exact logging solutions they need so they can focus on what they do best - create quality products.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about ELK Logstash
Learn more about LogDNA
Sample Customers
NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, Public Library of Science, OpenTextSprint, Grab, Autopilot, Just Eat, Verizon Wireless, Green Man Gaming, Compare Group, Tango, Perceivant, QuizletInstacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company7%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.