We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"The solution is compatible with the cloud-native environment and they can adapt to it faster."
"The product has huge integration varieties available."
"Elastic Security is very customizable, and the dashboards are very easy to build."
"The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."
"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"They don't provide user authentication and authorisation features (Shield) as a part of their open-source version."
"One limitation of Elastic Security is that it does not have built-in workflows for all tasks. For example, if you need a workflow for compliance, you will need to create a custom workflow."
"The price of this product could be improved, especially the additional costs. I would also like to see better-quality graphics."
"Anything that supports high availability or ease of deployment in a highly available environment would help to improve this solution."
"We'd like to see some more artificial intelligence capabilities."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"The solution does not have a UI and this is one of the reasons we are looking for another solution."
"An area for improvement in Elastic Security is the pricing. It could be better. Right now, when you increase the volume of logs to be collected, the price also increases a lot."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
Earn 20 points
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our Elastic Security vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
