Ember [EOL] vs Qvidian comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OGSystems Logo
views| comparisons
Upland Logo
155 views|47 comparisons
Ranking
Unranked
In Proposal Management
2nd
out of 11 in Proposal Management
Views
155
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
OGSystems
Video Not Available
Overview
Information Not Available

Contact Upland Qvidian: 1-800-272-0047

Qvidian is the only enterprise-grade proposal automation solution, providing security, compliance, and simplicity at scale to more than 1,000 companies and 200,000 users worldwide. With Qvidian, enterprises can win more business by streamlining processes, improving productivity, and creating more effective sales documents.

Drive efficiency, with a single content library where all assets are stored in approved language and branding. Expedite creating RFP, DDQ, and other questionnaire response drafts by automatically filling in the most relevant answers with AutoFill. Streamline content approvals and build audit trails, with automated, multi-step reviewer workflows. Track and measure KPIs, with custom analytics dashboards.

After launching Qvidian, on average, clients report a 40% increase in productivity, 30% reduction in RFP response times, and 28% increase in win rates.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Rosetta Stone, NetApp, Ellucian, Fifth Third Bank, Aramark, Accenture, Grant Thornton, Canon, Deloitte, First Data, Mercer, Herman Miller, ABM

Ember [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Proposal Management while Qvidian is ranked 2nd in Proposal Management. Ember [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Qvidian is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Ember [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Qvidian is most compared with .

See our list of best Proposal Management vendors.

We monitor all Proposal Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.