Atmos [EOL] vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,858 views|1,264 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and Google Cloud Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."

More Atmos [EOL] Pros →

"Using this solution has improved the security of our data.""I could store any type of file using the solution.""Access your files from anywhere, no installation necessary""It's a stable enough solution.""The solution's customer service and support are helpful since they are responsive...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.""The responses from the technical team are fast...It is a stable product...We do have plans to increase the number of users since it is a scalable product.""What I like about this program, is that it's quite fast, because you pay for your usage.""Everything I store in the solution is available on all of my devices."

More Google Cloud Storage Pros →

Cons
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."

More Atmos [EOL] Cons →

"The security of this solution and its performance could still be improved.""The solution could always be more user-friendly.""It is stable, but it can always be more stable.""Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel.""When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution.""Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity.""The licensing fees could be reduced.""The cost of additional storage could be cheaper."

More Google Cloud Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible."
  • "Better pricing would be helpful."
  • "Its price is fine."
  • "It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
  • "The price could be cheaper."
  • "The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The pricing is nominal for us as we are a charitable organization. We pay a monthly subscription fee.
    Top Answer:The solution’s stability could be improved.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Cloud Storage
    3rd
    out of 48 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    1,858
    Comparisons
    1,264
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Atmos
    Learn More
    Overview

    EMC Atmos is an object-based cloud storage platform to store, archive and access unstructured content at scale. Atmos provides the essential building blocks for enterprises and service providers to transform to private, hybrid, and public cloud storage.

    Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

    Sample Customers
    PEER1 Hosting, University of Illinois Hospital, Muzak Holdings
    1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise67%
    Large Enterprise23%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 3rd in Cloud Storage with 66 reviews. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Microsoft Azure File Storage.

    See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.