We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and HPE Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage."This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."
"This is a scalable solution that is available when we need it."
"One of the features offered and used by many clients is file-sharing."
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."
"Our customers in Canada cannot use it because it has to be compliant in the same country."
"Technical support is not available locally for us."
Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while HPE Cloud Object Storage is ranked 20th in Cloud Storage. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while HPE Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Cloud Object Storage writes "Simplifies our processes and environment and helps with costs and scaling because we don't need hardware and scale on demand". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas HPE Cloud Object Storage is most compared with .
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
