We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and pCloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage."This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."
"I can access my files from all kind of devices and operating systems. I do not need any more external flash drives. I can even edit my files directly in the cloud using pCloud Drive."
"The sync process has been quick, and the software correctly maintains the same file structure as in File Explorer."
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."
"My recommendation is that support could be better, even though sometimes things can be technically complicated."
Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while pCloud doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while pCloud is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of pCloud writes "The sync process has been quick and the software correctly maintains the same file structure as in File Explorer". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas pCloud is most compared with .
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
