We performed a comparison between Dell Avamar and Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The source site replication feature is valuable."
"Quick incremental backups and product replication are the two highlights of the product. Once you capture a full backup, incrementals are pretty quick. It is fairly efficient from that perspective."
"Dell EMC Avamar has many valuable features. It's very stable and it's easy to manage."
"The solution is very stable."
"The product is good for backups."
"It's stable and offers good performance."
"The solution scales well."
"The solution is very stable."
"The initial setup, if it is error-free, is very simple."
"A full-featured option for managing virtual machines with an instant recovery feature."
"The product is free to use. We don't have to pay for a license."
"It is good and easy to use for backing up physical servers. It is working fine, and it is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is application availability, which allows us to monitor all agents and accounts."
"It is a stable solution."
"Veeam is very user-friendly and intuitive software."
"We found the initial setup to be quite simple."
"The recovery is a bit slow."
"The user interface needs to be improved. It's not as good as it could be."
"Backup image browse times should be faster."
"The interface could be more helpful for people."
"The configuration and expansion aspects of the solution need improvement. They're complicated and don't really integrate well."
"It was challenging to back up our Exchange database, which is one of the reasons we did not continue using this solution."
"The initial setup is a bit complex and could be simpler."
"Setup and deployment of this solution is complex and requires expert engineers."
"I would like there to be more integration with other platforms."
"The backups can go slow."
"The price of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows could improve."
"If they could let you can do replication to physical servers - a backup from physical servers and a replication to physical servers - that will be better."
"In the next release, I would like to see it easier to implement."
"The solution lacks instant recovery."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows should improve by having more features, easier deployment, and compatibility with Unix boxes."
"It fulfills our needs in terms of features. In terms of improvements, they can maybe improve its documentation."
More Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell Avamar is ranked 13th in Backup and Recovery with 81 reviews while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery with 40 reviews. Dell Avamar is rated 7.8, while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Dell Avamar writes "Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] writes "Functional application availability". Dell Avamar is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell NetWorker, Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA) and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, AOMEI Cyber Backup, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.