• Home
  • Celerra [EOL] vs. Hitachi Mercury [EOL]

Celerra [EOL] vs Hitachi Mercury [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo

Celerra [EOL]

Read 1 Celerra [EOL] review
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Hitachi Vantara Logo

Hitachi Mercury [EOL]

views| comparisons
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Celerra [EOL] and Hitachi Mercury [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Highly scalable and reliable SAN with fiber channel connectivity but bulky in size and consumes a lot of power
Use Hitachi Mercury [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
Unranked
In NAS
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Celerra
Mercury, BlueArc
Learn More
Dell Technologies
Hitachi Vantara
Overview
Each Celerra unified product is a dedicated network server optimized for file and block access, delivering high-end features in a scalable, easy-to-use package. For the ultimate in scalability, the Celerra unified storage platforms leverage both the innovative best-in-class EMC Fibre Channel RAID storage and deliver industry-leading EMC Celerra availability, performance, and ease of management. Celerra unified storage systems deliver a single-box block and file solution offering a centralized point of management for distributed environments.
Mercury Technology has established comprehensive Managed Service plans for the Oracle software suite.
Sample Customers
Wentworth-Douglas Hospital, Kindred Healthcare, Cosentry, Sumitomo Life Insurance Company, Shriners, BZWBK
Moravian Land Archive, Nacamar, Neopost (France), Nielsen//NetRatings, Pacific Capital Bancorp, Raiffeisen Bank, Sema, Victoria and Albert Museum, Wasu Digital TV Media Group
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Celerra [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while Hitachi Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. Celerra [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Celerra [EOL] writes "Highly scalable and reliable SAN with fiber channel connectivity but bulky in size and consumes a lot of power". On the other hand, Celerra [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.