We performed a comparison between Celerra [EOL] and IBM System Storage N series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
Celerra [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while IBM System Storage N series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. Celerra [EOL] is rated 8.0, while IBM System Storage N series [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Celerra [EOL] writes "Highly scalable and reliable SAN with fiber channel connectivity but bulky in size and consumes a lot of power". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM System Storage N series [EOL] writes "All protocols come in the same box, including CIFS file server if you have NetApp experience this storage is the same". Celerra [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM System Storage N series [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best NAS vendors.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
