We performed a comparison between CLARiiON CX4 series [EOL] and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)."Service from EMC was extremely good. Whenever a disk had a problem, EMC was right on top of it. In some instances, they called me before I even knew what was going on."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"It is very stable."
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"It needs better deduplication. Deduplication was costing too many resources, hence we never used it."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
CLARiiON CX4 series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). CLARiiON CX4 series [EOL] is rated 6.0, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CLARiiON CX4 series [EOL] writes "It worked fine and was very reliable, though the throughput tended to be a bit slow". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". CLARiiON CX4 series [EOL] is most compared with , whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
