Compare EMC Isilon vs. NetApp FAS Series

EMC Isilon is ranked 4th in NAS with 1 review while NetApp FAS Series is ranked 3rd in NAS with 9 reviews. EMC Isilon is rated 9.0, while NetApp FAS Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of EMC Isilon writes "Powerful scalability, easy to manage, and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp FAS Series writes "Double-parity RAID guarantees that our data stays intact". EMC Isilon is most compared with Qumulo, NetApp FAS Series and Huawei OceanStor 9000, whereas NetApp FAS Series is most compared with EMC Isilon, IBM FlashSystem and Dell EMC PowerProtect DD (Data Domain).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
EMC Isilon Logo
11,930 views|8,749 comparisons
NetApp FAS Series Logo
11,691 views|9,232 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use EMC Isilon? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in NAS. Updated: April 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is extremely easy to manage. This is its most valuable feature.

Read more »

The most valuable feature for us is the combining of HA and SnapMirror.This solution provides us with easy management and great vendor support.One of the most valuable features offered is double-parity RAID, which guarantees that your data will stay intact. We're also able to provision storage and monitor which ones are really consuming storage.It is good to have a unified storage where you can have block and file level protocols.The initial setup was so straightforward. It was well-documented.It is very flexible. It integrates well with the public cloud and other components, so everything can be API driven. Therefore, it is very easy to automate it.Using the built-in Snapshots and SnapMirror technology, we were able to have better working data protection locally and off-site.The storage efficiency provided a maximum savings in our storage utilization.

Read more »

Cons
The solution isn't suitable for small environments or small customers.

Read more »

Currently, the newest release is not HCI friendly.Dedicated storage efficiency accelerators could improve the overall performance of the system.I would like to see less latency and higher IOPS.It lacks automatic tiering, When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives.The only downside is in ease in management; it is not easy to use.It's not a cheap system. It is very expensive. The pricing has been ridiculous every time that we had to renew the support.We would like to have further integration with some backup products. They have some of them already, but there could be more.The AutoSupport could be improved to be more proactive in certain cases.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The scalability is pretty good, but it's too expensive.The price, compared to competitors, is quite high.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Anil Vasudeva
author avatarShawn Kim
User

Isilon is Scale-out storage, while NetApp is Active-Standby storage.

Regarding the performance issue based on the field engineer’s experience, Isilon is better than NetApp in case of a huge amount of io, while NetApp is better than Isilon in case of a medium amount of IO.

author avatarLeandroPulido (IBM)
Real User

I think you need rewiew more than only performance or capacity, I have installed both machines, Netapp FASS have many options Hibrid or only objects, in Netapp Objects is StorageGrid where can obtain 720 TB in SG5760 but you can select SG6060 or SG5712 and Isilon is similar you have many options where could be ALL FLASH or SATA but Isilon is only NAS, and Isilon have many reference too, 8 reference F810 have 924 TB and up 250.000 I/Ops.

Actually I recommend one arquitecture where no focus only in one purpose, Scale up or Scale out all vendors have different alternatives and deppend the machine offer more I/O or Capacity, Midrange and High end, I don´t like Isilon because is only for NAS I dont like Hibrid or Unified Machines as FAS or VNX, I need to know which is the prupose for have a NAS because actually I can have a Storage for all protocols no only to CIFS and NFS and with prices cheaper than NAS, in conclusion I don´t like one Storage for NAS other for SAN other for Virtualization... Is better only one Storage where I can do it all, It reduce TCO.

author avatarBart Harrison
User

My recommendation is to take a close look at our CS Concerto Scale-Out Cluster system.

Ranking
4th
out of 34 in NAS
Views
11,930
Comparisons
8,749
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
247
Avg. Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 34 in NAS
Views
11,691
Comparisons
9,232
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
342
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Dell EMC
NetApp
Overview

Dell EMC Isilon scale-out storage solutions are designed for enterprises that want to manage their data, not their storage. Our storage systems are simple to install, manage, and scale to virtually any size. Isilon storage includes a choice of all-flash, hybrid or archive nodes. Isilon solutions stay simple no matter how much storage capacity is added, how much performance is required, or how business needs change in the future.

NetApp FAS Series offers powerful, affordable, flexible data storage for midsized businesses and distributed enterprises. NetApp FAS Series, named a 'Champion' and 'Best in Overall Value' by Info-Tech Research Group, is affordable, and is a more powerful storage platform than other systems in its class.
Offer
Learn more about EMC Isilon
Learn more about NetApp FAS Series
Sample Customers
OMRF, University of Utah, Translational Genetics Research Institute, Arcis, Geofizyka Torumn, Cyprus E&P Corporation, Colburn School, Columbia Sportswear, Harvard Medical School, University of Michigan, National Library of France,Children's Hospital Central California, Plex Systems, PDF PNI Digital Media, Denver Broncos, PDF KSM Legal, Clayton Companies, Virginia Community College
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer9%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Healthcare Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in NAS. Updated: April 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.