FTI Harvester vs Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FTI Harvester and Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
64
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In eDiscovery
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery
Learn More
Overview
FTI Harvester is a patent-pending integrated technology and services offering that provides corporations with a quick, comprehensive ability to collect and preserve documents from SharePoint with confidence. Rather than a simplistic keyword search across a variety of internal SharePoint sites, FTI Harvester focuses on key custodians, ensuring a focused, streamlined collection. By working closely with the corporate legal team, FTI Harvester helps eliminate costly rework and unnecessary deduplication downstream by identifying the necessary documents for review and production as early and effectively as possible.
EMC Kazeon eDiscovery is a quick-to-deploy appliance-based product that automates the in-house identification, collection, preservation, processing, analysis, and review of content that resides in live and archive data sources such as desktops, laptops, Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Network File System (NFS) file shares, Microsoft Exchange, Symantec Enterprise Vault, Microsoft SharePoint, and IBM Lotus Domino, and in corporate archives and content management repositories, such as EMC Documentum. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery in-place capabilities allows organizations to conduct eDiscovery and investigations, rapidly ascertain risk exposure, and meet privacy requirements while only collecting ESI which is relevant and legally obtainable. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery further provides flexibility, speed, and accuracy in transparently collecting relevant ESI in a defensible manner complete with auditing and data verification capabilities. With a simple user interface, legal teams can perform collection in a single step without requiring IT resources.
Sample Customers
Canadian Competition Bureau
Wentworth Douglass Hospital
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FTI Harvester is ranked 28th in eDiscovery while Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery. FTI Harvester is rated 0.0, while Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FTI Harvester is most compared with , whereas Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with OpenText EnCase eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.