Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] and Smarsh eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
19th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
182
Comparisons
118
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery
Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery
Learn More
Overview
EMC Kazeon eDiscovery is a quick-to-deploy appliance-based product that automates the in-house identification, collection, preservation, processing, analysis, and review of content that resides in live and archive data sources such as desktops, laptops, Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Network File System (NFS) file shares, Microsoft Exchange, Symantec Enterprise Vault, Microsoft SharePoint, and IBM Lotus Domino, and in corporate archives and content management repositories, such as EMC Documentum. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery in-place capabilities allows organizations to conduct eDiscovery and investigations, rapidly ascertain risk exposure, and meet privacy requirements while only collecting ESI which is relevant and legally obtainable. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery further provides flexibility, speed, and accuracy in transparently collecting relevant ESI in a defensible manner complete with auditing and data verification capabilities. With a simple user interface, legal teams can perform collection in a single step without requiring IT resources.

eDiscovery is a comprehensive, end-to-end eDiscovery platform that Operates. It Combines powerful analytical tools with core strengths in understanding human information, it presents a choice of document review options to match the right workflow to each unique matter and can be combined with other offerings. Discovery delivers broad coverage across data repositories and myriad data types, and is language independent to give you the fastest, most-complete solution on the market. eDiscovery helps corporations, law firms, and government entities prepare for, and react to, legal matters involving large amounts of data - without bias to repository or location. A pioneer in legal holds, early case assessment, and Technology-Assisted Review, eDiscovery helps you solve the full breadth of discovery and investigations challenges, from data collection through production. It covers the full spectrum of requirements, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), information management, preservation, processing, early case assessment (ECA), review and analysis, and production, allowing you to avoid the risk and cost of switching tools or vendors at different stages of discovery. eDiscovery is underpinned by our IDOL technology, which provides access to hundreds of data types and reaches across myriad data silos throughout the enterprise, this patented software also helps you understand human-generated (unstructured) information and administer data in place.

Sample Customers
Wentworth Douglass Hospital
Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Smarsh eDiscovery is ranked 19th in eDiscovery. Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Smarsh eDiscovery is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with OpenText EnCase eDiscovery, whereas Smarsh eDiscovery is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.