Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] vs Xerox CategoriX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] and Xerox CategoriX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
33rd
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
48
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery
CategoriX
Learn More
Overview
EMC Kazeon eDiscovery is a quick-to-deploy appliance-based product that automates the in-house identification, collection, preservation, processing, analysis, and review of content that resides in live and archive data sources such as desktops, laptops, Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Network File System (NFS) file shares, Microsoft Exchange, Symantec Enterprise Vault, Microsoft SharePoint, and IBM Lotus Domino, and in corporate archives and content management repositories, such as EMC Documentum. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery in-place capabilities allows organizations to conduct eDiscovery and investigations, rapidly ascertain risk exposure, and meet privacy requirements while only collecting ESI which is relevant and legally obtainable. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery further provides flexibility, speed, and accuracy in transparently collecting relevant ESI in a defensible manner complete with auditing and data verification capabilities. With a simple user interface, legal teams can perform collection in a single step without requiring IT resources.
Xerox CategoriX proprietary automated document classification technology that dramatically improves the speed, accuracy and consistency of litigation review.The tool also detects when two similar documents appear in different categories, prompting the legal team to take a closer look to ensure consistency. CategoriX leverages the expertise of attorneys and subject matter experts most knowledgeable about the case early in the process, and applies statistical and machine-learning techniques to calculate graduated relevance scores for each document in the collection. CategoriX combines powerful technology with human expertise to deliver a high-quality document review there is no need to install or maintain software, scale servers, train IT personnel or end users, or staff technical experts in-house.
Sample Customers
Wentworth Douglass Hospital
Hertz
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Xerox CategoriX is ranked 33rd in eDiscovery. Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Xerox CategoriX is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with OpenText EnCase eDiscovery, whereas Xerox CategoriX is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.