• Home
  • IBM System Storage N series [EOL] vs. Multi-Path File System [EOL]

IBM System Storage N series [EOL] vs Multi-Path File System [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM System Storage N series [EOL] and Multi-Path File System [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
All protocols come in the same box, including CIFS file server if you have NetApp experience this storage is the same.
It has provided a customer with CIFS file-server protocol.
Use Multi-Path File System [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
Unranked
In NAS
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
System Storage N series
Multi-Path File System
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Dell Technologies
Overview

IBM System Storage N series storage systems offer a solution for a broad range of deployment scenarios. IBM System Storage N series storage systems function as a multi-protocol storage device that is designed to allow you to simultaneously serve both file and block-level data across a single network. The flexibility of IBM System Storage N series storage systems allows them to address the storage needs of a wide range of organizations, including distributed enterprises and data centers for mid-range enterprises. IBM System Storage N series storage systems also support sites with computer and data-intensive enterprise applications, such as database, data warehousing, work-group collaboration, and messaging.

EMC Multi-Path File System enables data access at channel speeds, reduces network traffic, improves server performance, enhances Celerra Network Server performance and system scalability, and allows file sharing among heterogeneous clients.

Sample Customers
FreeBit, Ipeer, Trinecke Zelezarny, ACH Colombia, T-Mobile, Mitsubishi Motors Australia
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM System Storage N series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while Multi-Path File System [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. IBM System Storage N series [EOL] is rated 9.0, while Multi-Path File System [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM System Storage N series [EOL] writes "All protocols come in the same box, including CIFS file server if you have NetApp experience this storage is the same". On the other hand, IBM System Storage N series [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Multi-Path File System [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.