EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs FalconStor NSS [EOL]

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 2 reviews vs FalconStor NSS [EOL] which is ranked unranked in Data Replication. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and IBM Softek TDMF. FalconStor NSS [EOL] is most compared with EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication, Vision Solutions Double-Take and NetApp SnapMirror.

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

FalconStor NSS [EOL]

18139

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Based on 2 reviews.

20921

FalconStor NSS [EOL]

Most Helpful Review

RahmiAtıcı

Bussiness Development Manager

It has improved RTO and RPO

I worked as an IT manager and IT consultant. I have had many experiences with EMC and RecoverPoint. It has improved RTO and RPO.

Use FalconStor NSS [EOL]? Share your opinion.

Have A Question About Data Replication?

Our experts can help. 287,741 professionals have used our research on 6,454 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs FalconStor NSS [EOL]

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	2nd out of 13 In Data Replication Views 3,046 Comparisons 1,331 Reviews 2 Followers 190 Avg. Rating 8.5	Unranked In Data Replication
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	EMC AppSync vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 32% of the time. NetApp SnapMirror vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 26% of the time. IBM Softek TDMF vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 12% of the time. See more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors »	EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. FalconStor NSS [EOL] Compared 63% of the time. Vision Solutions Double-Take vs. FalconStor NSS [EOL] Compared 16% of the time. NetApp SnapMirror vs. FalconStor NSS [EOL] Compared 12% of the time. See more FalconStor NSS [EOL] competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication	FalconStor Network Storage Server
Website/Video
Website/Video	Dell EMC	FalconStor
Overview
Overview	EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.	Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Learn More	Learn more about FalconStor NSS [EOL] Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit	CommuniCare Health Services, Greater London Authority, Hessing Stiftung, Korea East-West Power

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs NetApp Snapshot and others in Data Replication.

Download now

287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.