Most Helpful Review
Use Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and others in Data Replication.
294,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
See more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors »
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 68% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager competitors »
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
|Also Known As||RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication||HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager|
|Overview||EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.||By transparently and interactively migrating data between heterogeneous storage tiers, HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager software enables IT administrators to match application quality of service requirements to storage system attributes.|
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about Hitachi HiCommand Tiered Storage Manager
|Sample Customers||Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit||Cumulus|