Compare EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp SnapMirror

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 6th in Data Replication with 2 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 3rd in Data Replication with 7 reviews. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 8.0, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "A well priced, stable solution that doesn't use too much bandwidth ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "A good solution with an easy setup, but needs to improve bandwidth efficiency for baseline replication ". EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and Symmetrix Remote Data Facility, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp Snapshot and EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: September 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it.It has improved RTO and RPO.It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks.

Read more »

This solution is easy to implement and easy to use.The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up.The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration.Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool.The solution is very stable.There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive.The most valuable feature is the snap shot.

Read more »

Cons
The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market.I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox.

Read more »

We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them.The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better.In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution.The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us.There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution.At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses.It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 19 in Data Replication
Views
1,333
Comparisons
841
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
213
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
out of 19 in Data Replication
Views
1,005
Comparisons
653
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
368
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote ReplicationSnapMirror
Learn
Dell EMC
NetApp
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.
Offer
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about NetApp SnapMirror
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, PanduitUniversity at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: September 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email