EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 2 reviews vs NetApp Snapshot which is ranked 6th in Data Replication with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". The top reviewer of NetApp Snapshot writes "​More reliable and accessible data protection than backups alone". EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and IBM Softek TDMF. NetApp Snapshot is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication. See our EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and others in Data Replication.
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It has improved RTO and RPO.It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks.

Read more »

You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines.It centralizes your data.You never have to worry about protecting your virtual machines.

Read more »

Cons
I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox.

Read more »

If your data is more dynamic and changes frequently, you need more granular retention levels and need to save it for a longer duration, then this becomes a real challenge.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
3,133
Comparisons
1,184
Reviews
2
Followers
126
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
135
Comparisons
97
Reviews
2
Followers
40
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors »
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
See more NetApp Snapshot competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Website/Video
Website/VideoDell EMC
NetApp
Overview
OverviewEMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.NetApp Snapshot point-in-time copy software protects data with no performance impact and uses minimal storage space.
OFFER
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Learn more about NetApp Snapshot
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersRegis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. NetApp Snapshot and others in Data Replication.
Download now
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email