Compare EMC SourceOne [EOL] vs. Micro Focus Content Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use EMC SourceOne [EOL]? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault vs. Microsoft Exchange and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
We work with Commvault and a partner on our environment needs according to capacity, licensing, pricing, components, modules, etc. Additional costs depend on your backup needs.We have checked some other products, but we are not testing them because price-wise, Commvault is better than the other solutions.It is cheaper than Veeam.It was not very popular because of its previous cost, but they have been working on the pricing, and now anyone can afford to use Commvault. They changed the modeling criteria for their pricing. Previously, there was only the capacity modeling based on your content capacity. In this case, they would give you a license and you would have to pay it. Now, most of the environment is virtualized so you can have the best CPU, VMs, etc. You buy whatever you need and pay for what you need.We went from Veritas NetBackup to Commvault. We switched due to upfront licensing and costs. We have more visibility into what we're actually purchasing. It seemed like, overall, the cost of Commvault was cheaper.The complete license gives us options for all the features. Commvault does not license based on storage or the management components. It can integrate with any storage vendor. That means that when we are out of storage and need more, we can integrate without additional licensing. In my opinion, Commvault needs to reduce the licensing cost by 20 to 40 percent to make it cost-efficient.Commvault licensing is a perpetual license so only the support is being renewed yearly.There is a bit of cost involved with signing up the entire solution. It's not a cheap solution.

More Commvault Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area.

More Micro Focus Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
SourceOneHPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
Learn
Commvault
Dell EMC
Micro Focus
Overview

Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime.

SourceOne for File Systems enables full text or primary metadata only indexing. With an Index in Place feature, it delivers the value of indexing and search to all files regardless of location. File system data can be placed on multiple target locations. Based on the location, data can be disposed of independently over time. NAS source data can be copied or moved to the SourceOne Archive, or tiered to one or multiple target devices.

Micro Focus Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

Offer
Learn more about Commvault
Learn more about EMC SourceOne [EOL]
Learn more about Micro Focus Content Manager
Sample Customers
Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, Alliant Credit Union, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz CompanyAHRC New York CityMissouri State Courts
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider19%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Government10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government6%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Government58%
Healthcare Company8%
Hospitality Company8%
Non Tech Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Government18%
Comms Service Provider8%
Transportation Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault vs. Microsoft Exchange and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
EMC SourceOne [EOL] is ranked unranked in File Archiving while Micro Focus Content Manager is ranked 3rd in File Archiving with 1 review. EMC SourceOne [EOL] is rated 0, while Micro Focus Content Manager is rated 3.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Content Manager writes "Difficult to learn, poor technical support, and needs better integration with SharePoint". EMC SourceOne [EOL] is most compared with Veritas Enterprise Vault, OpenText Email Archiving, Microsoft Exchange and Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, whereas Micro Focus Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText ECM, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Microsoft OneDrive.

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.