LizardFS vs ViPR [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LizardFS Logo
497 views|357 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LizardFS and ViPR [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
497
Comparisons
357
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ViPR
Learn More
Overview

Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can also be used to build space-efficient storage, because it is designed to run on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is just as easy as adding a new one.

EMC ViPR is software-defined storage to manage and automate all storage resources for traditional and next-generation cloud storage platforms. EMC ViPR Controller is storage automation software that centralizes and transforms storage into a simple, extensible, and open platform. It abstracts and pools resources to deliver automated, policy-driven storage services on demand through a self-service catalog Ð reducing time, cost, and risk.
Sample Customers
Orange Polska, Platige Image, United State Department of Agriculture, Virtu Financial
POST Telecom
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
University12%
Computer Software Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise54%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while ViPR [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS). LizardFS is rated 8.6, while ViPR [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ViPR [EOL] writes "ViPR SRM gives us insight into our VNX arrays that are distributed across the United States, but it doesn't permit setting up LDAPs via Web UI". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage, whereas ViPR [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.