Enablon vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Wolters Kluwer Logo
251 views|169 comparisons
SAP Logo
460 views|325 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Enablon and SAP BusinessObjects GRC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The license is costly."
  • "There is a yearly licensing cost. I would rate their pricing 4 out of 5."
  • "SAP BusinessObjects GRC is expensive."
  • "The product's licensing costs involve a one-time purchase. The tool also allows others to make annual payments towards the licensing charges of the product."
  • More SAP BusinessObjects GRC Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports
    Top Answer:There isn't anything in particular that my company doesn't like about the product. It is an old system that is currently being used by its users, which works in areas like prompts and reports. I think… more »
    Top Answer:We implement this solution mainly for the reporters and analysis applications. The solution is deployed on-premise.
    Ranking
    32nd
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    251
    Comparisons
    169
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    460
    Comparisons
    325
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Enablon GRC Suite
    BusinessObjects GRC
    Learn More
    Overview

    Enablon GRC solutions provide a consistent and all-encompassing approach to corporate governance, enterprise risk management, and compliance.

    SAP GRC helps you automatically detect, remediate, and prevent access risk violations - no matter the industry or business size. Get real-time visibility into your current risk position, and confidently reduce unauthorized access, fraud, and the cost of compliance.
    Sample Customers
    Danone
    INEOS Melamines GmbH, Banco Galicia
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    GRC
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Enablon is ranked 32nd in GRC while SAP BusinessObjects GRC is ranked 10th in GRC with 5 reviews. Enablon is rated 0.0, while SAP BusinessObjects GRC is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP BusinessObjects GRC writes "Improved our organization's reporting culture and has given us insights into operational results". Enablon is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas SAP BusinessObjects GRC is most compared with Greenlight Continuous Monitoring, RSA Archer, Security Weaver, IBM OpenPages and Oracle GRC Controls.

    See our list of best GRC vendors.

    We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.