We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"I like trap prevention DNS and threat prevention."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"The solution provides dashboard control, so we can centrally monitor the entire status of our organization."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"We know that McAfee isn't the best antivirus and it can't protect us 100%, although we are okay with the level of protection that it gives us."
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."
"There are certain shortcomings in the features concerning DLP in Trellix, where certain additions must be made in the future."
"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 25 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 94 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.