ENEA Polyhedra vs IBM IMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Logo
59 views|38 comparisons
IBM Logo
99 views|96 comparisons
Ranking
15th
Views
59
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
99
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
IMS
Learn More
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Government14%
Manufacturing Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise75%

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while IBM IMS is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while IBM IMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.