Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. InterSystems Caché

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Polyhedra Logo
29 views|11 comparisons
InterSystems Caché Logo
322 views|179 comparisons
Ranking
15th
Views
29
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
322
Comparisons
179
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PolyhedraInterSystems Cache
Learn
ENEA
InterSystems
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Offer
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra
Learn more about InterSystems Caché
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMDCysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.