Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. InterSystems Cache
ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Cache is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0, while InterSystems Cache is rated 0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Cache is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Berkeley DB and Actian db4o.
Ranking  | |
Views 39 Comparisons 17 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 494 Comparisons 288 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 68% of the time. Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Polyhedra | |
Learn | |
| ENEA Video Not Available | InterSystems |
Overview | |
| Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability. | Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra | Learn more about InterSystems Cache |
Sample Customers | |
| Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD | CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA) |
See also ENEA Polyhedra Reviews, InterSystems Cache Reviews, and our list of Best Non-Relational Databases Companies.
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.