Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. InterSystems Cache

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Cache is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0, while InterSystems Cache is rated 0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Cache is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Berkeley DB and Actian db4o.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Polyhedra Logo
39 views|17 comparisons
InterSystems Cache Logo
494 views|288 comparisons
Ranking
18th
Views
39
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
8th
Views
494
Comparisons
288
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn
ENEA
Video Not Available
InterSystems
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Offer
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra
Learn more about InterSystems Cache
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMDCysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.