Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. InterSystems Caché
Ranking  | |
Views 29 Comparisons 11 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 322 Comparisons 179 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 100% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Polyhedra | InterSystems Cache |
Learn | |
| ENEA | InterSystems |
Overview | |
| Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability. | Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra | Learn more about InterSystems Caché |
Sample Customers | |
| Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD | CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA) |
ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory.
See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.