Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. InterSystems Cache

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 19th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Cache which is ranked 6th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0, while InterSystems Cache is rated 0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Cache is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, Actian db4o and SAP HANA.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Polyhedra Logo
141 views|22 comparisons
InterSystems Cache Logo
1,293 views|334 comparisons
Ranking
19th
Views
141
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
6th
Views
1,293
Comparisons
334
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn
ENEA
Video Not Available
InterSystems
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Offer
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra
Learn more about InterSystems Cache
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMDCysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email