ENEA Polyhedra vs Matisse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Logo
59 views|39 comparisons
Matisse Logo
67 views|50 comparisons
Ranking
15th
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
Views
67
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn More
Matisse
Video Not Available
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
The database for Web Services. Includes Native Object and XML Support, ANSI SQL Support, no Object-Relational mapping.
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
ABB, Airbus, AMP, Areva / Cogema, Baan, Bayer, Cap Gemini Ernest & Young, CEA Technology, Deutsche Bank, Dunn & Bradstreet, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Hitachi, IBM Netherlands, NEC, Nokia, Panasonic, Pfizer, Philips, Sanofi, Saudi Aramco, Siemens, Sony Electronics, Tokyo Gas, Tokyo Hospital, Thales Group, UBS Warburg, Unilever Reasearch, University of Gronigen, Vivendi Universal

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while Matisse is ranked 12th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while Matisse is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas Matisse is most compared with Actian NoSQL Object Database.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.