ENEA Polyhedra vs TileDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Logo
59 views|39 comparisons
TileDB Logo
112 views|47 comparisons
Ranking
15th
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
Views
112
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn More
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.

TileDB, Inc. is a data management company founded to help Data Science teams make faster discoveries, by giving them a more natural way to store, analyze and share large sets of diverse data, so that they can stop wasting time working around performance limitations, inadequate data storage formats, and unfamiliar tooling.

Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
Azure, Lustre, hadoop

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while TileDB is ranked 11th in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while TileDB is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas TileDB is most compared with Objectivity DB.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.