Entrust TransactionGuard vs Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Entrust TransactionGuard and Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
81
Comparisons
60
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
503
Comparisons
376
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
TransactionGuard
FraudMAP
Learn More
Overview

Provides real-time monitoring of transactions, automatic detection of fraudulent activities and comprehensive case management tools.

Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is the first fraud prevention solution to use behavior-based anomaly detection. To complement our expertise in behavioral analytics, we actively study fraudsters’ techniques to make sure we’re always one step ahead. We are also the only solution that automatically and immediately protects 100 percent of users and account holders against all types of threats and schemes, and dynamically adapts to new attacks and changes in legitimate user behavior. In addition to fraudulent payments, we detect account takeover, reconnaissance, and fraud set-up activity that indicate possible criminal activity in the early stages of an attack so our customers can proactively intervene before there’s any money movement. And we do it all without rules and without disrupting users’ normal activity or process.

Sample Customers
Banco Security, IndianMusicInfo.com, Oakland County Michigan, SILA Communications
Illinois Community Bank, NEFCU
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm46%
Computer Software Company10%
Retailer5%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Entrust TransactionGuard is ranked 41st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is ranked 15th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Entrust TransactionGuard is rated 0.0, while Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Entrust TransactionGuard is most compared with , whereas Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection is most compared with Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, F5 Shape Security and IBM Trusteer.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.