EOS ITPM vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
EOS Software Logo
104 views|71 comparisons
erwin by Quest  Logo
1,494 views|891 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between EOS ITPM and erwin Evolve by Quest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."
  • "On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."
  • "The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."
  • "The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."
  • "Yearly, our cost is €100,000."
  • "I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."
  • "I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."
  • More erwin Evolve by Quest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Evolve's reverse engineering ability is quite useful.
    Top Answer:Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and… more »
    Top Answer:I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.
    Ranking
    Views
    104
    Comparisons
    71
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,494
    Comparisons
    891
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    1,175
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture
    Learn More
    EOS Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    EOS ITPM enables enterprise to effectively prioritize and govern of the respective project portfolios tailored to its need. It provides aggregated and integrated governance capabilities to PMO team to continously monitor health of the projects and programs. EOS ITPM solution allows enterprises to establish a robust integrated application portfolio, helps enhance the value derived from these enterprise architecture models, complements end user's asset discovery tools, enables to rapidly establish of record around platforms, technologies and associated versions used within enterprise, help provides rich capabilities to establish a tiered business process portfolio, helps establish data portfolio and enables a consistent management of enterprise standards across variety of cross-functional areas.

    erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

    erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    EOS ITPM is ranked 30th in Enterprise Architecture Management while erwin Evolve by Quest is ranked 9th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 19 reviews. EOS ITPM is rated 0.0, while erwin Evolve by Quest is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of erwin Evolve by Quest writes "Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data". EOS ITPM is most compared with , whereas erwin Evolve by Quest is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, erwin Data Modeler by Quest, SAP PowerDesigner and IDERA ER/Studio.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.