Epicor [EOL] vs QAD Enterprise Applications comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Epicor [EOL] and QAD Enterprise Applications based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, NetSuite and others in Activity Based Costing Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Activity Based Costing Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Activity Based Costing Software
Views
81
Comparisons
60
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Activity Based Costing Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, NetSuite and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Epicor, founded in 1972, specializes in developing enterprise resource planning (ERP) software for companies operating in the manufacturing, distribution, retail, service and hospitality industries. Currently, Epicor has over 20,000 clients in 150-plus countries. Its business solutions software is further tailored to specific customer needs, and it is available in more than 30 languages. The Austin, Texas-based company operates development centers in North and Central America, Europe and Australia. Its approach to market-specific ERP systems resulted in revenue of $840 million for the year 2011. Its dedication to its clients is perhaps best represented by its annual Insights conference for customers. This event regularly attracts more than 4,000 attendees. Epicor's ERP software products are designed to streamline clients' business processes by incorporating those different processes into a single cloud-based or web-based package. Also, while Epicor only offers a single ERP brand, it tailors versions specifically for five areas: manufacturing, distribution, retail, hospitality, and professional services. Each version has industry-specific tools, but all Epicor products are complete ERP solutions, providing a single, comprehensive frame of reference for use by management and employees in order to improve efficiency. In addition to ERP software, Epicor produces customer relationship management (CRM) and supply chain management (SCM) products, as well as tools for human capital, product and financial management. Its business software solutions packages are scalable, so they are suited to businesses of all sizes. Some of its clients, for example, began using Epicor ERP products as small businesses, then went on to grow into billion-dollar operations. Also, each of its clients is afforded access to the company's team of experts for support issues.

QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

Sample Customers
IONICS, Pacific Insight Electronics, CRS Electronics
Vitatech
Buyer's Guide
Activity Based Costing Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, NetSuite and others in Activity Based Costing Software. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Epicor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Activity Based Costing Software while QAD Enterprise Applications is ranked 13th in Activity Based Costing Software. Epicor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while QAD Enterprise Applications is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Epicor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas QAD Enterprise Applications is most compared with Adexa eGPS and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.