Epicor Vista [EOL] vs QAD Cloud ERP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Epicor Vista [EOL] and QAD Cloud ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.
Top Answer:I rate the pricing an eight out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
Top Answer:The product lacks a lot of features and technology. It is really limited. The tool must improve in almost all areas. There are a lot of things that should be improved in the manufacturing and shop… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In ERP
25th
out of 66 in ERP
Views
572
Comparisons
412
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
530
Rating
5.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Vista
MFG/PRO
Learn More
Overview

Epicor Vista is a world-class, integrated manufacturing and accounting solution for emerging manufacturers, job shops or make-to-order departments of large enterprises. Vista employs an intuitive user interface with tree navigation, grid entry, drill down capabilities and icons for point and click simplicity.

Vista is loaded with innovative tools that will help you take control of estimating, orders, scheduling, costing, inventory, quality and much more. It also has the power to assist key business initiatives such as lean manufacturing and quality performance management.

Epicor Vista is a next-generation manufacturing and accounting solution based on the Microsoft .NET Framework and using a true service-oriented architecture (SOA). Vista, as the emerging market version of Epicor Vantage, achieves unparalleled flexibility. You have access to the information you want, in the format you want, when you want it, to make informed business decisions. As your business grows, the system will adapt to both planned and unplanned changes in your business and is a tool to help you rapidly employ new business strategies.

QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

Sample Customers
Microsoft
Tower International, Kendra Scott
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Manufacturing Company10%
Educational Organization9%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise46%
Buyer's Guide
ERP
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Epicor Vista [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in ERP while QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 25th in ERP with 2 reviews. Epicor Vista [EOL] is rated 1.0, while QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Epicor Vista [EOL] writes "If you do not setup the correct printer path every day, it will crash. I have to use many tools to add a product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". Epicor Vista [EOL] is most compared with , whereas QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, NetSuite ERP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.