Compare Episerver Content Cloud vs. SharePoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Episerver Content Cloud Logo
589 views|514 comparisons
SharePoint Logo
28,213 views|23,959 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Hi, I believe that for an environment administrator, using a solution of this size such as SharePoint is more comfortable, you often already have email (O365) and other products. Therefore this… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
589
Comparisons
514
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
Views
28,213
Comparisons
23,959
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
515
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
EPiServer, Ektron, EPiServer CMS
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn More
Overview

Episerver CMS is a market-leading web content management system and digital marketing suite. It enables editors to drag-and-drop content to quickly create new digital experiences that are automatically responsive.

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Offer
Learn more about Episerver Content Cloud
Learn more about SharePoint
Sample Customers
Danske Kommuner, DLFA, Oister, Zenji, Suunto, Barratt London, Bradstone, Lauritz.com, Meyers Mad, Varner Gruppen, InnerWorkings
Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm12%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
University8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Episerver Content Cloud is ranked 12th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 7 reviews. Episerver Content Cloud is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Episerver Content Cloud is most compared with Sitecore Experience Manager, Drupal, WordPress, Dynamicweb and Kentico, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.