Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
1,292 views|837 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,076 views|857 comparisons
70% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager and Oracle WebCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website.""Easy to work with the solution.""I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle.""If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR.""I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution.""Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them.""It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer."

More Adobe Experience Manager Pros →

"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server.""WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.""Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data.""The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet.""A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access.""It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage.""Integration within the solution is very good."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros →

Cons
"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved.""I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement.""In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good.""Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution.""Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved.""Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service.""The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

More Adobe Experience Manager Cons →

"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system.""Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version.""The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product.""This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language.""I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features.""Its functions need more stability.""The speed of the backup should be enhanced.""There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."
  • "It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."
  • "Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."
  • More Adobe Experience Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price needs to be lowered."
  • "The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."
  • "WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing and stability could be improved.
    Top Answer:Adobe Experience Manager is used for user experience, product design, and user journeys.
    Top Answer:WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,292
    Comparisons
    837
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    1,076
    Comparisons
    857
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    189
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud
    WebCenter, FatWire
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers. 

    Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

    Sample Customers
    Metra
    Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization41%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Pharma/Biotech Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    University9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise43%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe Experience Manager is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager is rated 7.8, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager writes "A powerful product that can be used for user experience, product design, and user journeys". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". Adobe Experience Manager is most compared with Adobe CQ5, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, WordPress, SharePoint and SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, WebLogic Suite, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and WordPress.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Web Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.