Compare PoolParty Semantic Suite vs. erwin Data Catalog

erwin Data Catalog is ranked 9th in Metadata Management while PoolParty Semantic Suite is ranked 14th in Metadata Management. erwin Data Catalog is rated 0, while PoolParty Semantic Suite is rated 0. On the other hand, erwin Data Catalog is most compared with , whereas PoolParty Semantic Suite is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
9th
out of 22 in Metadata Management
Views
130
Comparisons
100
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
out of 22 in Metadata Management
Views
4
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Learn
erwin, Inc.
Semantic Web Company
Overview

erwin Data Catalog (DC), part of the erwin Data Intelligence Suite, automates enterprise metadata management, including data mapping, code generation, data profiling, data lineage and impact analysis. It integrates and activates data in a single, unified catalog in accordance with business requirements by scheduling ongoing scans of metadata from the widest array of data sources, keeping metadata current with full versioning and change management, and easily mapping data elements from source to target, including data at rest and in motion, and harmonize data integration across platforms.

PoolParty Semantic Suite is world-class technology for your data.
It offers sharply focused solutions to your knowledge organization and content business. Build the backbone of your Enterprise Semantic AI infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about erwin Data Catalog
Learn more about PoolParty Semantic Suite
Sample Customers
Balfour Beatty Construction, Banco de México, BFSI Canada, CenturyLink, DaktronicsHealthDirect, Boehringer Ingelheim, Council of EU, Wolters Kluwer
We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.