Compare PingDataGovernance vs. erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance

erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 4 reviews while PingDataGovernance is ranked 28th in Data Governance. erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance is rated 8.2, while PingDataGovernance is rated 0. The top reviewer of erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance writes "Enabled us to centralize a tremendous amount of data into a common standard, and uniform reporting has decreased report requests". On the other hand, erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Informatica Axon and Alation Data Catalog, whereas PingDataGovernance is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use PingDataGovernance? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag.erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors.You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in.The whole suite, not just the DI but the modeling software, the harvester, Mapping Manager — everything we have — is about $100,000 a year for our renewals. That works out to each module being something like $8,000 to $10,000.The licensing cost is around $7,000 for user. This is an estimation.There is an additional fee for the server maintenance.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
418,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 28 in Data Governance
Views
929
Comparisons
432
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
2,609
Avg. Rating
8.3
28th
out of 28 in Data Governance
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
erwin DG, erwin Data Governance
Learn
erwin, Inc.
Ping Identity
Overview

The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

PingDataGovernance provides policy-based, fine-grained access controls for attribute-by-attribute data protection and filtering for regulatory compliance and consent management. It has a graphical user interface for business users to collaboratively build, test and enforce access control policies to data across user directories and APIs. It provides a centralized solution to authorize and filter API calls in real time—a huge benefit to managing and enforcing customer data privacy.

Offer
Learn more about erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance
Learn more about PingDataGovernance
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Government22%
Healthcare Company9%
Insurance Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence (DI) for Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.