• Home
  • erwin EA Agile [EOL] vs. iServer

erwin EA Agile [EOL] vs iServer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
erwin by Quest Logo

erwin EA Agile [EOL]

views| comparisons
Orbus Software Logo

iServer

Read 15 iServer reviews
3,444 views|1,448 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between erwin EA Agile [EOL] and iServer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use erwin EA Agile [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Very flexible and user friendly with pre-use training program provided
iServer is excellent at capturing, organizing, and most particularly, presenting knowledge about the strategic, and operational information about... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost."
  • "It's about 13K to set up and 9K for the license for three months. I think it's about 20K a year, but we haven't firmed up on pricing yet because the price depends on how long we commit to the solution."
  • "The price of iServer is reasonable compared to other solutions."
  • "They offer annual subscriptions for developing countries, which are not affordable for small or medium businesses."
  • "The product has a moderate pricing."

    • More iServer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about iServer?
    Top Answer:iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with iServer?
    Top Answer:They haven't introduced new features for the product's on-premise version since 2021, similar to the SaaS version. There could be features for process mining, process simulation, and analytics.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for iServer?
    Top Answer:We use the product for various critical functions within our environment, particularly in a government entity, where it assists in governance, workflow management, and generating reports and live… more »
    Read all 10 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Enterprise Architecture Management
    6th
    out of 37 in Enterprise Architecture Management
    Views
    3,444
    Comparisons
    1,448
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    erwin by Quest
    Orbus Software
    Overview

    As the name suggests, erwin EA Agile takes a different approach to enterprise architecture (EA). The collaborative, cloud-based platform is an easy-to-use and cost-effective path for launching an EA program quickly. Built-in support for such industry frameworks as TOGAF and ArchiMate enables you to model the enterprise, capture the IT blueprint, and provide meaningful insights to stakeholders to more quickly and easily manage complexity and change.

    iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making.

    Sample Customers
    Plymouth University, Springer Nature
    Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    University10%
    Maritime Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization34%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    erwin EA Agile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Architecture Management while iServer is ranked 6th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 15 reviews. erwin EA Agile [EOL] is rated 0.0, while iServer is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of iServer writes "Enables flexible parameters for any process model and has a valuable document management feature ". erwin EA Agile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas iServer is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, ARIS BPA and MEGA HOPEX.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.